May 26, 2012

Aliens in Drag

The original comic.
This is the fourth post in a series where I search for evidence of interesting aliens in Summer 2012 SciFi flicks. I've been reading online about the plot of Men in Black 3, one day after its release. (I have not seen the movie.) But first, some background....

The origins of the Men in Black are mysterious,  but the secret organization was formed to deal with rumors of alien contacts. I like to imagine that there have been alien visitors coming to Earth for a very long time, but in the 1950s humans began to have technology that would allow alien visitors to be detected. In 1961 there was a secret arrangement forged between some aliens and the Men in Black.

Agent K
There are nasty wars going on "out there" among the stars, and planet Earth is a kind of refugee center for displaced aliens. Most Earthlings would freak out if they knew the truth, so the Men in Black must recruit a special breed of Agents who will do what must be done: cover-up all evidence of alien visitors on Earth. In the 1960s, Agent K is recruited into the Men in Black and he must abandon his dreams of a normal life with his girl.

Agent J
1997. In the original Men in Black movie we see Agent J as a superhuman cop and perfect fit for the Men in Black organization. Soon after Agent K recruits Agent J into the secret organization, Agent K is actively planning his own retirement. What is so special about Agent J? How can he so quickly replace the vastly experienced Agent K?

Laurel
While working on his first "MIB must save Earth" mission, Agent J meets Laurel Weaver and he is attracted to her and concerned for her mental health. Her job frequently brings her in contact with aliens and she has repeatedly been neuralized in order to make her forget what she has seen.

Agent L
Agent J recruits Laurel to be his MIB partner and we can imagine a happy future for them as the dynamic duo (Agent J and Agent L) of the post-sexual revolution Men and Women in Black.

However, in Men in Black II we find that the "Agent J and Agent L live happily ever after" idea never worked out. Apparently Laurel and none of the other Men in Black can meet Agent J's standards. Why does Agent J have "the right stuff" while other Men in Black recruits often wash out?

Also, Agent K's retirement plan (to re-unite with his long-lost-love) has not worked out and he comes back on duty. Is there something special about Agent K and Agent J that makes it inevitable that they be Men in Black?

Laura Vasquez: half human & half alien?
Laura Vasquez comes into Agent J's life and he is attracted to her. We learn that Laura is the daughter of an alien, Queen Laurana of Zarthan. Laura must leave Earth to fulfill her destiny on Zarthan. Is there some secret backstory, was there a relationship between Agent K and Queen Laurana? We have to start wondering: can aliens like Laurana mate with humans?

My original introduction to the concept of an alien living on Earth among humans was by way of seeing Superman on television in the late 1960s. When aliens appear who look just like humans we need some backstory. Are the aliens shape shifters who take on human form? Are these "aliens" actually a branch of the human species with a long history of travel between Earth and other worlds?

MIB3. In Men in Black 3 we start to learn some of Agent J's backstory. At the age of 5, his father died (in 1969), killed by an alien (Boris). Agent K was there and apparently arranged for the young boy to have a fairly normal childhood (not letting the boy know that his father had been killed by aliens), eventually growing up to become Agent J. What do we learn about the mother of Agent J?

Boris is the standard Evil Alien (yawn).

K (left) - Griffin (center) - J (right)
The most interesting alien in MIB3 is "Griffin". There seem to be some tips of the hat in MIB3 to Back to the Future. In Back to the Future, time travel is only possible if the time machine reaches a speed of 88 miles per hour. Apparently there is a similar speed gimmick in the "time jumps" for MIB3. Is Griffin named in honor of Griff Tannen?

Griffin, as an alien, can apparently view many possible timelines and futures. This reminds me of  Noÿs Lambent, a character in Asimov's time travel novel The End of Eternity. Noÿs is a woman from the far future, from a time when humans have the technological means to view alternative Realities (timelines) and select among them in order to achieve the best outcome for humanity.

So many evil aliens, so few Men in Black
Intriguingly, it sounds like Agent J also has the ability to perceive alternate Realities. Near the start of MIB3 when the Evil Alien (Boris) goes back in time and kills Agent K, it is somehow possible for Agent J to remain aware of the previous Reality. Is it possible that Agent J has "alien blood"?

Chocolate milk. In MIBII Agent K used some clues/tricks that allowed himself to recreate the story of the "Light of Zartha" even after having been neuralized. As a biologist, I can't swallow the idea that changes in the timeline just happen to induce a physiological craving for chocolate milk in the star of a movie.

Give me the milk!
However, if some Arcadian "time police" had tried to make the Men in Black forget about time travel, they might have planted a clue/trick that would trigger key people such as Agent O to recognize the clue as a an indication that time travel had taken place. Some people have suggested that part of the charm of the Men in Black films is that the heroes are ordinary people. I think it would be a better story if Agent J is a human-alien hybrid with some special powers, but I might be letting my own desires for an interesting backstory leapfrog over the actual aspirations of the MIB script writers.

When first seen in MIB3, the younger Agent K is yet to have an experience that will change his personality, making him more like the older crusty Agent of the future.

Crusty old K
Based on the reviews I have read, it is not clear that the full basis for this "personality change" becomes known to the audience during MIB3. Is it only that Agent K ends up feeling responsible for the death of Agent J's father?

Time Travel Paradox: Meeting Yourself...or not

Due to the wonders of time travel, towards the end of MIB3 there are two "copies" of the alien bad guy in 1969: 1) the one from 1969 and 2) the one from the future who traveled back in time to 1969.

During the climactic fight scene, to save himself from being killed, Agent J "goes back in time a few seconds" and -poof- apparently there is still only one of him, remembering the future and saving himself from death. I put "goes back in time a few seconds" in quotes because it might be that Agent J is half-alien and has the ability to "see" future events. I'm not confident that the puzzled reviewers of MIB3 (example) are accurately reporting what happens in the movie. Alternatively, maybe the creators of the movie just "threw in the towel" and did not bother to make their time travel device work the same way all the time (boo!).
Surprise! You've been cast as the evil alien in MIB3!




Time Travel Paradox: Hollywood Director Controls All Time Travel by Saying "Action"

Isaac Asimov summed up the place of time travel in science fiction: we simply cannot resist creating time travel stories....they are so much fun that science fiction authors often just cannot let slip away a chance to make one.

For me, a major issue is that if time travel technology were invented, allowing people to travel into the past, then we would always be wondering: is anything we experience "final" and "real"? Won't time travel always be used (again and again) to alter the course of events? We must confront this issue and put some constraints on time travel.

Clara
Isaac Asimov wrote time travel out of The End of Eternity (after he had his fun with it), imagining one final Reality Change that would make time travel impossible. In Back to the Future, the Doc decides that time travel is dangerous, so he apparently goes ahead and builds a second time travel machine, but only uses it to go to the future, acquire advanced technology and then live happily-ever-after with Mary Steenburgen.

What kind of time travel constraints exist in MIB3? Apparently Agent J has only 24 hours in the past before his magic time machine turns back into a pumpkin.

Time travel in MIB3

YAAIM
Many time travel stories degenerate into "time wars" where "time police" have to constantly struggle against "time bandits". MIB3 seems to adopt this kind of time travel plot. Evil Aliens can use time travel to save their alien invasion forces from destruction....but only once....and just for a chance to make YAAIM (Yet Another Alien Invasion Movie). Apparently the Men in Black normally enforce a ban on time travel, but when the movie director says "action" they will go ahead and use time travel to reverse the effects of Evil Alien time travel and prevent today's alien invasion of Earth. Hooray!

Why is there a ban on time travel? Maybe because it creates "alternate timelines" and that makes Griffin's head spin?

Alien Invasion Paradox Number 23: Why does the alien invasion always wait until the hero is ready and able to defeat the aliens?

Why do alien invasions always fail? 
Some commentators on MIB3 have lamented the brief screen time devoted to the impending alien invasion. Others (example) have asked: why does Agent J have time to respond and stop the alien invasion? Why doesn't the invasion come in 1975 or some other time before "Agent J" is even aware of the Men in Black and before he becomes a MIB Agent and before time travel is even invented? Answering this question takes us deep into time travel paradox and how the story-teller imagines that time travel would work. If you feel that it is a waste of time to expect the plot of a Men in Black movie to make sense, then skip the next 1000 words.

In science fiction there have been many proposals for how time travel might work. In Men in Black 3, what kind of time travel rules are in play? 

Will Marty be erased?
In Back to the Future, Marty has to deal with the problem of "being erased" when he travels back in time. If he does something that prevents his parents from getting married then -poof- he was never born and he is "erased" from existence (after having traveled through time into the past). The timeline is altered from that point. There is no "alternate parallel Reality" where the Marty of the future continues to grow up and is able to travel back in time: that future is destroyed and replace by a new timeline. Marty's appearance in the past and his actions that result in his mother never giving birth to him are a time travel-induced miracle that defies our conventional concept of causality. In Back to the Future it is also imagined that Marty can be in a kind of "temporal interphase" where he is half erased. Call this "Version A" time travel.

In The End of Eternity, Asimov imagined another kind of time travel. In order to prevent their own "erasure", Asimov's time travelers (the "Eternals") lived in an artificially constructed bubble universe (Eternity), where they were safe from the alterations of Reality that could be caused by time travel. Within Eternity there is no causal linkage to time in the bulk of the universe, instead there is a local "P-time" within the bubble universe where the Eternals live and they experience an independent causality. When traveling outside of Eternity and venturing into conventional time/space, the Eternals wore a protective device (a portable "P-time field generator") that enveloped them in a localized extension of the protective bubble universe of Eternity. In the climax of the story, a time traveler in the past alters the historical timeline and destroys Eternity itself, but he (and his girl friend, Noÿs Lambent) is protected from "erasure" by wearing a protective P-time field generator. Call this "Version B" time travel.

Time travel device.
Does MIB3 assume "Version B" time travel? It sounds like Boris and Agent J carry a time travel device. Does that device function like Asimov's P-time field generator? I've read nothing indicating that MIB3 uses this kind of time travel. However, commentators such as LondonFilmFan seem to assume time travel in MIB3 allows you to go back into your past and create time paradoxes such as being able to kill your mother before you are born. Is that a safe assumption?

In MIB3, how many timelines for Earth's history are there?  Three?
1) a timeline where Boris never travels through time (yawn, no MIB3 movie)
2) a timeline where Boris travels through time and kills Agent K and Earth is invaded by Evil Aliens (Boo!)
3) a timeline where Boris and Agent J both travel through time, Agent K survives and there is no alien invasion (Hooray!)

ArcNet deployment
In order to make the movie, Boris must create timeline #2. He has a task to complete in the past: prevent Griffin from providing the protective "ArcNet" that will block the alien invasion of Earth. There is a timeline with altered events in 1969 where Boris is able to do this (in the movie, the audience sees the alien invasion starting). However, the audience never sees all the events of that 1969 and the years leading up to the alien invasion. I assume that in the unseen timeline "Boris from the future" prevents Agent K from capturing "Boris of the past" and in so doing prevents Agent K (and anyone else) from installing the ArcNet. What else happens in that timeline? Agent K is killed in 1969, but, strangely, the Men in Black (and Agent J) are still working in 2012.

How can that be? Why wasn't there an alien invasion of Earth soon after Boris from 2012 went back to 1969 and prevented Agent K from protecting the Earth with the ArcNet? Imagine a new timeline (#2a) where the Evil Alien invasion is completed and humans on Earth are under alien domination by say, 1975. In such a #2a timeline maybe Obadiah Price would never invent time travel and Agent J would never grow up to join the Men in Black. Aliens would rule Earth. However, that does not happen in the movie. Why not?

Boglodite in drag. Is Boris bad enough?
There is yet another type of imagined time travel. In "Version C" time travel, there can be no time travel paradoxes. Time travel to the past is possible, but you can't do some things such as go back in time and prevent yourself from being born.  If MIB3 assumes "Version C" time travel then "future Boris" can go to 1969, but he can't change 1969 in a way that would prevent himself from traveling through time. Maybe in timeline #2 "future Boris" kills Agent K in 1969 but Obadiah Price must still invent time travel so that Boris can travel back through time from 2012 to 1969.

James, I am your father.
We never see the details of timeline #2 (in which Agent K dies in 1969) but we must assume that Boris would not be able to kill Agent K unless Obadiah Price invents time travel close to 2012. Thus, I assume that the alien invasion is delayed until 2012, giving Agent J the chance to grow up and join the Men in Black. I assume he is destined to do so because of his super-human abilities (such as seeing alternate Realities), even if Agent K dies in 1969. Maybe in the absence of Agent K (timeline #2), Agent O makes sure that James grows up and joins the Men in Black. Eventually, as shown in the movie, Agent J goes back to 1969 and creates timeline #3, saving Earth from the Evil Aliens just in the nick of time. (Hooray!)

If, as LondonFilmFan seems to do, you assume that MIB3 uses the same kind of rules for time travel as were used in Back to the Future then it makes no sense that Agent J has a chance to stop the alien invasion. However, we do not have to make that assumption.

Men in Black 4?

So, who was Agent J's mother, someone like Griffin who has the ability to be conscious of past, future and alternate Realities? Are there other planets where human-like aliens live out their lives until they need to hide from a bad guy alien, come to Earth and make a Men in Black movie?

MIB4, anyone?
While slumming on Earth, do the human-like aliens mate with Earthlings, thus creating the next generation of Men in Black agents? Will MIB3 bring in enough $$$ to justify making MIB4? If so, will we get to meet Agent J's mother, is there more to say about Agent K's backstory or will the story shift back to Agent J's future? Will Agent J find the half-alien of his dreams?

At the level of meta-analysis, is there a reason why Earth is a crazy bin of oddball aliens? I mean, besides the obvious goal of people in Hollywood trying to make money?

Griffin

Tralfamadorian
When I was discovering science fiction novels in the 1970s, I had to read Slaughterhouse-Five in school. I found the idea that someone might become "unstuck in time" very disturbing.

The Tralfamadorians were always saying, "So it goes," and at the time (age about 14) I had read too much Plato and it offended me deeply to think that people (or aliens) might adopt a fatalistic attitude.

However, about that time I was also reading some of Ed Smith's  novels where he wrote about the Arisians who could imagine future events in precise detail. (I've seen a few web pages indicating that Griffin is an Arcadian.) I started doing "thought experiments" where I tried to imagine a future in which humans developed a new attitude about time that allowed them to adopt a new language in which distinctions were not made between past, present and future. I eventually came to the conclusion that even if the universe were completely deterministic and if free will were an illusion then we humans should still behave as if we have free will because we had evolved so as to function best if we are continually striving for a better future. Is Griffin on Earth to make sure that we Earthlings remain unaware of aliens, that we keep building our own future?

A bag full of galaxies.
Apparently Griffin can not only see into the future, but he can also (telepathically?) share his visions of other times with nearby humans. Lucky for we Earthlings, Griffin seems to be on our side and willing to provide the Men in Black with advanced technology (ArcNet) to keep Earth safe from the Evil invading Boglodites. (Whew! What a relief!)

I'm intrigued by Clarke's Law: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". Are the seemingly magical abilities of Griffin due to some kind of advanced technology? So far, the Men in Black movies have never really explained the science behind the idea that there can be an entire galaxy that is the size of a marble. What kind of advanced technologies are available to folks like Griffin?

Agent J out on the town for sushi
In the Exodemic Fictional Universe I imagine that the Huaoshy have advanced science and technology that allows them to work with forms of matter where the individual particles are much smaller than atoms. The Huaoshy have also discovered that there are additional spatial dimensions beyond the conventional extended dimensions that we are aware of via our human senses.

If there are alien visitors on Earth who have technology that is a billion years more advanced than the primitive technology that we have developed here on Earth AND if those aliens act to protect Earth from Evil Aliens then why do the poor Men in Black have to run around working so hard? I mean, besides the comic effect of Will Smith battling giant slimy fish and bugs?

If we were treated to Men in Black 4 would we get any answers, anything like a coherent backstory or just a continuing frenetic effort to throw every available SciFi plot device into the mix? By playing fast and loose with time travel in MIB3 are the Men in Black creators in danger of "jumping the shark" and leaving audiences behind, frustrated by apparent incoherence of the plot?

Visions of the Future
Alternatively, is it only in the context of a comedy that Hollywood can introduce some science fiction themes? In a serious science fiction story would audiences become bored and impatient with explanations of complex SciFi plot elements, but when watching a comedy most viewers are not going to think too hard...they just want a fun ride for two hours?

The bottom line

I think I'm hooked. I hope that MIB3 does well enough ($$$$) that there will be another movie in the series. I'd like to hear about Agent J's mother and learn that she was/is some kind of human variant from a distant world, possibly a visitor to Earth who, like Griffin, lends a helping hand to we Earthlings. Given the way that characters in the Men in Black movies can morph, unzip, dress and undress for success, it might even be that Griffin turns out to be Agent J's mother.

Gary and Isis

Been there, done that

 In Assignment: Earth, Gary Seven and the shape-shifting Isis had to get up close and personal with a rocket just before launch in the 1960s. We got to witness that because the crew of the Enterprise went back in time and kindly arranged for the filming of Gary Seven for an episode of Star Trek.

MIB3
Similarly, the climactic scene of MIB3 takes place at the top of the Apollo 11 rocket just before launch. The world-saving ArcNet must be sent into outer space in order to stop an alien invasion.

NASA video
The idea of people (and cats) on top of rockets in the 1960s is upsetting to some people. Why didn't anyone notice? NASA made video recordings of the Apollo launches, so why would it be possible for various people and aliens to be up there changing critical flight control circuits and attaching alien devices?

In Hollywood everything becomes possible, even mandatory, when you need a dramatic visual scene for the big moment of the television episode or the Summer popcorn flick. "It looks cool" always trumps "this should make sense".

Many commentators have also wondered why the Men in Black would have to make use of something as primitive as an Apollo moon rocket when they have buddies like Griffin. I think it is safe to say that in 1969 the Men in Black can't just ask some convenient alien to take the ArcNet into space. Did things later change? Who built the prison to hold Boris on the Moon? Who was kind enough to fly Boris and all the guards (not to mention Nicole Scherzinger)  to the Moon? Maybe Steven Spielberg gets group discount rates for space travel....maybe Spielberg is an alien.

Next blog post in this series: Ancient Aliens.

Some famous Aliens in Drag
Serleena from MIBII

Assassin in Mars Attacks


















Ella Swenson; cowgirl alien
 Scarlett Johansson in Under the Skin
                       (right; upcoming movie [update])

From Earth Girls are Easy, Jeff Goldblum, Damon Wayans, Jim Carrey (below)
 
Jeff
Damon
Jim
   

May 12, 2012

Horror, Comedy and SciFi in the Woods?

Please kill me so I can get out of this movie.
This is the third in a series about science fiction films in 2012.  

Full disclosure: I've never seen a horror movie that I liked, and thankfully I've only seen parts of some on television. I don't understand people who pay $ to watch fantasy torture, dismemberment and cannibalism. More to the point, I have a problem with the concept of "science fiction horror", particularly when it involves aliens traveling vast distances between the stars in an attempt to provide movie-goers with chills and a fright. I'm trying an experiment aimed at testing if I can get over my disinterest in horror: I've started working on a science fiction story that includes human sacrifice. I'm still in a personal mental space where I prefer thought-stimulating mystery over fright-inducing surprises.

I imagined that The Cabin in the Woods is a horror story...on Earth...with no alien invaders....the story taking place in our time....that is to say, not SciFi.  I was recently surprised to see it described as a science fiction story.


Fox, I am your father.
So, there are some dudes using pheromones and other pseudoscientific tricks to manipulate the behavior of people...and make them suffer horrifying deaths....and that makes The Cabin in the Woods science fiction?


The X-Files. I've long thought of the aliens in The X-Files as being the least competent alien invaders in the history of Hollywood. However, since I dislike alien invasion stories, I am pleased that the vast incompetence of the alien "Colonists" actually made The X-Files a non-invasion story. I suppose it was a huge budget reduction to have so many X-Files episodes where they only had to buy cigarettes for the CSM rather than pay the costs of generating CGI aliens. I like SciFi stories about aliens who collaborate with some humans while keeping their existence secret from most people on Earth (see Exodemic Fictional Universe), so The X-Files is of interest to me, and I've even written some X-files fan fiction. However, many of the X-File episodes strike me as being more oriented towards fantasy and horror than science fiction.


If the Syndicate had no interaction with alien invaders, if they were just a super-duper-secret organization that was trying to placate mysterious subterranean "ancients" by trying to create human-version-2.0 in a genetic engineering lab on a Hollywood backlot then would The X-Files be counted as science fiction? If The Cabin in the Woods were just a variant of The Truman Show where Joss Whedon and a gang of Hollywood ca$h $ucking millionaire$ were killing kids for fun and profit then would it count as science fiction? I think not.

Die, virgins, I'm saving the world.
I've never seen The Cabin in the Woods, but my understanding is that it functions as a meta-horror story where it is imagined that all the blood and gore of Hollywood horror stories can be blamed on a mysterious "ancient being" who demands human sacrifices. Sigourney Weaver is there to keep the blood flowing and so prevent The End Of The World. Ta Da! Yuk yuk.

The meta-horror premiss of The Cabin in the Woods reminds me of the story Jokester where Isaac Asimov had fun with the idea that humor only existed as part of human culture because it was an experiment being performed by aliens. Question: could The Cabin in the Woods have depicted the idiocy of horror films as being caused by space aliens and, in so doing, firmly established itself as a science fiction film? I think not. If you leave the source of evil as a fantasy "ancient one" then it does not have to make any sense.

Fuller disclosure. I've never watched Buffy, Firefly or Serenity. If you throw a spaceship into a space western story does that really make you a science fiction writer?

Wagon train to the stars
Even fuller disclosure. I have a personal problem with the boundary between fantasy and science fiction....and the boundary between horror and science fiction...and the boundary between westerns and science fiction. My problem is that, for me, horror and fantasy and other genres like westerns are oil to science fiction's water. I say: please do not mix!

I'm fascinated by people such as Joss Whedon who have no trouble mixing and combining elements of fantasy, horror, westerns and science fiction, but I'm an advocate for bringing to the big screen more thought-provoking science fiction adventure stories that make sense of the universe and humanity's place in it.

I'm not happy when I'm subjected to science fiction that is written by people who 1) do not understand science, 2) have no interest in the revolution in discovery, exploration and understanding that defines our scientific age and 3) just want to throw in a random spaceship or other technological wizbanger into a story as part of an effort to advance and $ell an otherwise tired old plot.

Some science fiction is just a fun and creative story set in an imagined future. If I actually took the time to watch Firefly I might find that I adore the cast and stories and I might be satisfied. That is a bit of a fantasy because as a science fiction fan I've never been satisfied by any SciFi television show. Some episodes of Star Trek fascinated me when I was 12 years old (example), but then I started reading science fiction and, in my opinion, television has never managed to do justice to science fiction.

They should have sent a poet.
Picky, picky, picky. You might ask if any science fiction from Hollywood has ever satisfied me. I'm fairly happy with the way that Carl Sagan's Contact turned out. Sagan's story provided a combination of discovery (SETI and first contact) and big questions, particularly, 1) where is everyoneRobert Zemeckis took a story written by a scientist and Ann Druyan and gave it some big screen magic while retaining the flavor of Sagan's original vision.

My largest complaint about Contact is that Sagan was never able to give us a sequel that would have explored the second big question that was explored in the novel by Sagan: 2) could there be scientific evidence to support the idea that the universe was created by intelligent design? I think there is a waiting opportunity for creation of a Contact television series that would build on the 1997 film.

2012. I'm pleased that horror fans were treated to a clever horror movie (The Cabin in the Woods) and that comedy science fiction fans will be getting another dose of Men in Black this Summer (update: MIB3 is out...see my blog post). It is nice that many comics fans are luxuriating in The Avengers (but see this view: "sound and fury, signifying nothing" from just beyond the theatrical moshpit of the fanboys). I'm still waiting for a science fiction miracle: that Hollywood might release a movie this year with an interesting SciFi story about human-alien interactions. I'm not holding my breath.

What interests me most about The Cabin in the Woods is that at a meta-meta-level it is a "critique of what we love and what we don't about horror movies". I think comic and horror fans have a fighting chance of seeing satisfying films in their favorite genres if there are people creating those films who love and understand the genres. I'd like to see that happen for science fiction. Sagan and Zemeckis showed that it is theoretically possible to put intellectually-stimulating science fiction on the big screen without needing to throw in some absurd alien invasion or other tired old Hollywood plot device. It is sad that Sagan seems to have been a once-in-a-lifetime phenomenon, someone who understood science and science fiction and how to use media like television and film to edify and entertain. It would have been fun if Sagan had lived into the internet age...maybe he could have been a force for meaningful change in how Hollywood looks at science fiction.

____________________________________________________

Continue to part four of John's Summer 2012 Search for Interesting Hollywood Aliens:
Aliens in Drag

May 8, 2012

Disney and Entertainment and Science Fiction, Oh My!

Walt Disney and Wernher von Braun.
The Primal Mainstream
The Walt Disney Company is a huge entertainment engine that owns both Pixar and Marvel. A company that would create something like The Cat from Outer Space (1978) might not seem like a good bet for bringing intellectually-stimulating science fiction to the big screen, but it was The Black Hole (1979) that started Disney away from the G-rating and down the road towards adult entertainment.

Dejah Thoris with a Thern medallion.
The movie Tron (1982) is credited with helping make clear the potential for computer-generated video and some critics viewed WALL-E (2008) as viable science-fiction story in the Pixar computer animation family of films. Personally, I find it hard to think of Tron:Legacy (2010) as science fiction, since it is more of a fantasy about video games. Mars Needs Moms (2011) reminds me of Moon Pilot (1962),  and I'd like to forget both of these films.


2012


John Carter. I've never been a fan of the adventure/fantasy/science fiction of Edgar Rice Burroughs. I'm intrigued by the way that the John Carter film presents the Therns as technologically advanced manipulators of civilizations on planets such as Mars and Earth, but why do they bother? I was first exposed to "space vampires" that feed on human conflict by Star Trek (Day of the Dove and Wolf in the Fold) and I do not understand the persistence of this meme in Hollywood unless it is due to guilt over the way that so many people can be sucked into paying for an endless progression of good vs. evil stories about soul-sucking monsters. I'd like to know if the script developers for John Carter were planning an interesting backstory for the Therns or if the plan is just for more mindless repeating of a tired old plot device.
My god, Loki, I hope you're paying for this call!

In the Exodemic Fictional Universe, the Huaoshy maintain a balance between the Overseers and the Interventionists, but the Huaoshy are not evil. I wish Hollywood could move away from reliance on plots where a hero has to battle the evil alien.


The Avengers. If only Nixon could go to China, is it only Disney that will be able to open a pop culture market for science fiction stories that portray gods as aliens? Disney previously got into trouble by having an association with Dogma (1999). I suspect it is now part of Disney culture to only make movies that explore non-Christian deities as being alien creatures.

It might be that the Norse gods are an optimal place to start. I don't understand how the writers for The Avengers envision the "gods". In the Marvel Cinematic Universe is Thor a human-like being that makes use of advanced technology (Mjolnir?) or are Thor and Loki genetic variants of humans or do they have magical powers (all of the above?)? I don't understand what it means for Thor to be put into a human body.

In the Exodemic Fictional Universe I imagine that advanced nanotechnology can make it possible to shape shift and instantiate an alien mind in a human body. I hope that something similar is going on in The Avengers. I fear that this is all just another fantasy story where the writers do not care to make a coherent science fiction story and the goal is only to blow up a large number of bad guys, but I hope not. I'd be pleased if this is a start towards someone in Hollywood making some interesting stories about aliens who interact with Earth over long periods of time with many different human-like groups and cultures being the result.


Rich Ross.
Conspiracy theory. Did Disney try to kill John Carter? Some have wondered why Disney called John Carter a $200 million loss when the film was only just released. Was someone looking for an excuse to dump Rich Ross? Was there something planned in the John Carter sequel that was too hot for Disney? 

I'd love to see a sequel that includes telepathic Lotharians influencing events on Earth and maybe the son of John and Dejah doing something that helps Earth resist the Lotharians. Is the Thern teleporter also a time travel machine? Is the world depicted as Barsoom by Edgar Rice Burroughs actually Mars of the future?

I've never understood how a human from Earth could go to Mars and father children with the Martians. What if Barsoom is in our future, after humans from Earth have terraformed Mars and created genetically-modified humans? If Barsoom is the future, what is the fate of Earth at the time when John Carter's children are on Mars? Has Earth's civilization collapsed, leaving only decayed remnants of human civilization on "Barsoom" and on Earth? Would such a future for humanity be too dark for Disney?

___________________________________________________

Oh, my.

___________________________________________________
This (above) is the second of a series of blog posts about my Search for Interesting Hollywood Aliens (SIHA). Here are links to the other SIHA 2012 blog posts:
Start: SciFi Summer 2012
Next:
Horror, Comedy and SciFi in the Woods?
Aliens in Drag
Ancient Aliens
The exciting conclusion to the 2012 Search for Interesting Hollywood Aliens
Promethean Rorschach Test

May 6, 2012

SciFi Summer 2012

Thanos.
Here we are in the weekend of the US launch of The Avengers, Men in Black 3 is still about three weeks out and Prometheus will follow soon after.

Alien Invasion. Mr. Thanos is your evolutionary cousin, one of the branches of humanity that was created by the Celestials about 5 million years ago. As an Eternal, Thanos might be expected to protect Earth against the Deviants, but some how his mother was unable to pass the correct genes to him and so Thanos has some Deviant genes. Thanos is in love with Death, and is apparently involved with the alien invasion that forms the basis for The Avengers movie.

Men in Black 3
Is there any chance that future Marvel movies will expand on the exodemic-like plot elements of The Avengers (humans originated from the work of aliens who carried out genetic engineering on proto-human apes) or will those movies simply give us more conventional Hollywood good guys vs bad guys who run around blowing up things and each other?

Men in Black 3 has a time travel plot in which evil aliens must be thwarted. Apparently there are some interesting constraints on time travel such as a 24 hour limit when going back in time. I wonder if there will be any attempt to explain who gets to travel through time and for what purpose or if this will just be yet another example of someone in Hollywood saying, "we wanted to have a story back in the past so we just did it." In the Exodemic Fictional Universe the Huaoshy control all time travel and they only use it for special problems that arise on primitive planets.

Star map.
Last Summer I was titillated by the possibility that Hollywood might be catching on to the possibility of making movies about sneaky extraterrestrial visitors to Earth who would be here for reasons other than those depicted in typical alien invasion movies. I had high hopes for Prometheus, but it looks like little more than a re-do of Alien. Possibly a miracle will occur and there will be some explanation for how it was possible for "ancient astronauts" to leave a "calling card" (a star map) on Earth and then have nothing to do with Earth for thousands of years.

So there we have it, three Summer SciFi movies for 2012 that will be scooping up hundreds of millions of dollars, and all three of these movies had/have a chance to tell us something interesting about alien visitors to Earth. So far, The Avengers only has an evil dude using mind control to launch an alien invasion of Earth. Of course, the good guys beat back the attack....leaving room for the next movie in the $erie$.

Alien life from Prometheus.
Two chances remain for something interesting to slip out of Hollywood this Summer, but I'm not holding my breath for anything but more of the same tired old $tuff from Prometheus and Men in Black 3.

Here is my best-case scenario for Prometheus: maybe the aliens (for lack of a better name I'll call them the Slime Masters) who long ago visited Earth, have spent the past several thousand years developing their own entertainment industry. Fascinated by their own horror movies, the Slime Masters abandoned space travel and devoted all their creative energies to a genetics program resulting in the creation of armies of slime-dripping alien creatures that are good for thousands of years of Hollywood-type horror movies. When the Prometheus arrives at the home world of the Slime Masters, the aliens recognize a great marketing opportunity and rush back to Earth to license their slime-dripping creatures for use as props in Hollywood. To their great dismay, they realize that Hollywood has its own armies, thousands of geeky CGI programmers who do nothing but dream up new monsters for Hollywood productions. Dismayed and demoralized, the Slime Masters go back to a time (1975) when they can sell their slimy creatures to the highest bidder...resulting in the inspiration for the original Alien movie. Writers for The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and Forbes will write long articles about the deep significance of Prometheus as social commentary about capitalism. The movie will become required part of business school curricula across the country. The Occupy Movement will make use of the slime-dripping aliens of Prometheus as icons of the super rich.

Have a nice Summer!

This (above) is the first of a series of blog posts about my Search for Interesting Hollywood Aliens (SIHA). Here are links to the other SIHA 2012 blog posts:
Disney and Entertainment and Science Fiction, Oh My!
Horror, Comedy and SciFi in the Woods?
Aliens in Drag
Ancient Aliens
The exciting conclusion to the 2012 Search for Interesting Hollywood Aliens
Promethean Rorschach Test