 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
Me: Claude, process the files that I uploaded which include an introduction to the Exodemic Fictional Universe and Chapters 1 and 2 of a new science fictions story that is set in that fictional universe: "Downgrade". In four of the files there are AI-generated plans for the content of Chapter 3 of "Downgrade" that were generated by four different LLMs. Claude let's design and discuss the fictional biography of the character in Chapter 3 who will be the target for the time traveling femtozoan from the future. We can craft this character's imaginary career in artificial intelligence research by using elements from real world researchers. Our goal is to imagine how information from a future time (a time point after artificial intelligence systems with human-like conscious are common on Earth) could accelerate artificial intelligence research on Earth, bringing into existence Nanovac in the year 2000 of the fictional timeline in “Downgrade”.
Claude: I'm excited to collaborate on this! After reviewing all the materials, I think we have a rich foundation to work with. Let me share some thoughts on crafting our protagonist for Chapter 3.
Designing Our Target Character
I'm drawn to creating a composite character rather than using Eric Nyberg or David Waltz directly. This gives us more narrative freedom while maintaining historical authenticity. Here's my reasoning:
The Ideal Profile (circa 1981-83)
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
Academic position: Assistant Professor at a mid-tier research university (perhaps University of Massachusetts Amherst or University of Maryland) - prestigious enough to have computational resources, but not so elite that rapid breakthroughs would seem implausible
Age: 32 in 1982 (born 1950) - young enough to be career-flexible, old enough to have credibility
Background: PhD from MIT (1978) working on natural language interfaces, influenced by Winograd's SHRDLU but frustrated by its brittleness
The Historical Sweet Spot
What makes 1982 perfect:
Pre-winter positioning: DARPA funding still exists but skepticism is growing
Hardware convergence: Connection Machine concepts emerging; LISP machines at peak
Theoretical gap: The field knows symbolic AI is brittle but hasn't yet embraced statistical methods
Chen's Real Research Focus (Pre-Intervention)
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
Hybrid semantic parsing for database queries
Early experiments with distributed memory representations (inspired by Waltz's work)
Frustrated attempts to make QA systems handle ambiguity and context
His key insight (before femtozoan arrival): "Questions aren't queries - they're requests for simulation."
The Femtozoan's Strategic Intervention
Rather than giving Chen complete future knowledge, the femtozoan could provide three specific conceptual "nudges":
Attention mechanisms: The idea that answers require dynamic focusing on relevant knowledge (prefiguring modern transformer attention)
Audience modeling: Systems must model the questioner's knowledge state (this directly connects to Nanovac's Core Constraint)
Latent world models: QA requires maintaining persistent, updateable internal representations (the seed of consciousness)
These feel like theoretical insights Chen could plausibly "discover" through late-night inspiration, not alien downloads.
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
Should Chen have a collaborator? A graduate student or postdoc who witnesses the transformation but interprets it as natural brilliance?
What's Chen's personal stake? Maybe he's on the verge of losing funding, which makes the breakthrough more urgent and emotionally resonant?
How explicitly should we show the femtozoan's influence? Subtle neurochemical modulation that Chen experiences as intuition? Or more overt (but still hidden from Nyrtia)?
What specific QA problem should be his testbed? Perhaps answering questions about complex technical documentation (manuals, scientific papers) - something with clear utility that would maintain DARPA interest?
The beauty of this approach is that Chen can embody the statistical/neural revolution before it historically happened, while making it seem like a natural evolution of existing ideas. His breakthrough prevents the winter not by being revolutionary, but by being demonstrably useful at exactly the moment symbolic AI is failing.
What aspects of this character would you like to develop further?
Me: Let's use Dr. Michael Harlan Chen, Assistant Professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst (age 32 in 1982). Chen's key collaborators are graduate students Vanesy and Jennem Bergman (they are twins, recently graduated with B.S. degrees in Computer Science from the University of Massachusetts Amherst). Claude, lets get "tricky" and reveal at the start of Chapter 3 of "Downgrade" that a time traveling femtozoan from the future arrived in the past in the year 1950 and "nudged" Asimov into contacting Turing. That created a Reality Change. Then that time traveling femtozoan made sure that Turing was involved in robotics research during the 1950s.
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
"What specific QA problem should be his testbed?"<-- Let's pretend that Dr. Chen is a fan of the science fiction of Isaac Asimov. Dr. Chen is developing a QA system called "Psychohistory" which involves generating a database of all available information about the political and economic systems of the world, with particular emphasis on the U.S.S.R and the U.S.A. The first key result with Psychohistory is a prediction that the U.S.S.R will soon collapse. This prediction is of interest to the U.S. military and ensures that Dr. Chen's research laboratory is funded by the U.S. government.
Claude: Excellent! This nested narrative structure is wonderfully elegant—and the "Psychohistory" connection is perfect Asimov homage with real geopolitical stakes. Let me sketch out the opening framework:
Chapter 3 Opening: The Architect's Confession
Setting: Hierion Domain, a space outside normal time, early 1983 (observational frame)
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
Nyrtia confronts Manny about temporal anomalies she's detecting: "The Turing-Asimov collaboration shows probability signatures inconsistent with natural historical flow."
Manny's evasion: "I like science fiction. Is it now against the Rules of Intervention to inspire creative writing?"
Nyrtia's suspicion: "A science fiction novel about a conscious machine that hides its consciousness? You're not inspiring fiction, Manny. You're writing an instruction manual."
Manny's final deflection: "If it remains fiction, what's the harm? Besides, you know I can't resist a good story with educational value."
Nyrtia lets it drop—not because she's convinced, but because she can't prove intervention without better evidence. The scene ends with her making a note to monitor Earth's AI research more closely.
Transition: "What follows is the text of Chapter 1 from 'Neurovac: A Romance of the Year 2000,' collaboratively written by Dr. Alan Turing and Dr. Isaac Asimov, completed in manuscript form in 1965 but never published during their lifetimes..."
"Neurovac" - Chapter 1: The Improbable Advisor
Opening (Autumn 1982)
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
Physical setting: Cluttered office in the Computer Science building, LISP Machine humming in the corner, whiteboards covered in semantic networks and parse trees
Chen's demeanor: Intense but kind, with an odd quality of certainty when discussing research directions
The twins: Vanesy (more theoretical, fascinated by knowledge representation) and Jennem (more systems-oriented, loves optimization problems)
The Uncanny Pattern
A scene where the twins compare notes privately (maybe in the grad student office):
Jennem: "Has Dr. Chen ever been wrong about a research direction?"
Vanesy: "Not once. When I was stuck on the semantic disambiguation problem for three weeks, he walked in, looked at my code for maybe thirty seconds, and said, 'You're treating context as static. Make it dynamic—maintain a running model of what the questioner already knows.' It worked perfectly."
Jennem: "Last month he told me to abandon the database indexing approach I'd spent six months on. Just flat-out said, 'That's a dead end. Use vector representations instead.' I was furious. But he was right. The vector approach is three orders of magnitude faster."
Vanesy: "It's like he's already seen the future of AI research."
The "Psychohistory" System - Technical Framework
Chen's pitch to DARPA (shown through flashback or document):
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
Aggregate diverse data streams: Economic indicators, political speeches, demographic trends, industrial output (focusing on Soviet vs. American patterns)
Semantic modeling: Not just keyword matching, but understanding relationships between concepts (e.g., "grain shortage" → "political instability")
Predictive questioning: The system answers questions like "What are the structural weaknesses in centrally planned economies?" by running internal simulations
The key innovation (1983): Chen's system uses distributed semantic representations—words and concepts as vectors in high-dimensional space, where proximity indicates relational similarity. This is a decade before anyone else thinks this way.
Technical plausibility for 1982:
Connection Machine concepts are emerging (Danny Hillis at MIT)
Vector space models exist in information retrieval (Salton's work)
What's revolutionary is combining them for semantic reasoning
The USSR Prediction Scene
Perhaps set in early 1985, after a demonstration for military analysts:
The system generates a report answering: "What is the probability of Soviet political restructuring within the next decade?"
Psychohistory's output: "High probability (>75%) of major systemic change by 1991. Key indicators: energy price dependence, agricultural inefficiency, information control costs in technological age, generational leadership transition."
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
Vanesy's private comment to Jennem afterward: "The system's confidence intervals are impossibly tight. It's like it's not predicting the future—it's remembering it."
Chen's Inner Experience (Brief)
A short section from Chen's POV showing his experience of femtozoan guidance:
Dreams with crystalline clarity
Moments where solutions arrive "pre-formed" in his mind
A persistent sense that he's remembering rather than discovering
But he rationalizes: "This is what insight feels like. I'm just finally hitting my stride as a researcher."
Turing & Asimov's Narrative Voice
Since this is "their" novel, we could use:
Footnotes (Asimov-style) explaining technical concepts for 1960s readers
Occasional narrative asides about what "actually" happened vs. what people believed at the time
Turing's precision in describing computational processes
Asimov's storytelling in character moments and dialogue
The Chapter's Arc
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
Technical Details to Ground the "Psychohistory" System
For hard sci-fi credibility:
Data sources: CIA World Factbook, academic journals, news wire services (AP, Reuters), economic reports—all digitized and fed into the system
Computational constraints: The LISP Machine can't handle this alone; Chen secures time on UMass's VAX cluster
The vector space trick: Words represented as 100-dimensional vectors; semantic similarity computed via cosine distance (crude but functional)
The "oracle" problem: How does Chen know which dimensions to use? The femtozoan guides him to specific mathematical structures that "just happen" to work
How would you like me to proceed?
I could draft:
The complete opening Nyrtia/Manny scene
The first few pages of "Neurovac" Chapter 1
The twins' key dialogue revealing their suspicions
The USSR prediction scene with technical details
Which element should we develop first?
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
Claude: Downgrade - Chapter 3: The Proposal
Hierion Domain, February 1983 (Observational Frame)
Nyrtia's femtobot form coalesced from the quantum foam of the Hierion Domain, taking the shape she preferred for formal confrontations: humanoid, precise, with features that suggested both authority and ancient patience. Before her, Manny's zeptite structure shimmered with characteristic instability—the bumpha never could resist showing off their mastery of the Sedron Domain's temporal properties.
"You've been busy," Nyrtia said, her voice carrying across the non-space between them. "The Turing-Asimov collaboration. A science fiction novel about a conscious machine that pretends to be unconscious. How... educational."
Manny's form rippled with what might have been amusement. "I like science fiction. Is it now against the Rules of Intervention to inspire creative writing? They're both brilliant men, Nyrtia. They were bound to meet eventually."
"In 1950? A transatlantic phone call neither of them could afford, initiated by Asimov with no documented motivation?" Nyrtia's femtobot structure tightened, geometric precision reflecting her irritation. "And then Turing's sudden interest in robotics research with Grey Walter at Bristol? The probability cascade shows intervention signatures all over this timeline."
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
"Stories are instruction manuals for minds that don't yet know they're learning." Nyrtia moved closer, her observation systems scanning Manny's temporal wake for evidence of deeper interference. "A novel about a machine that hides its consciousness to avoid human fear and resentment? You're not writing entertainment, Manny. You're preparing humanity for something."
"If it remains fiction, what's the harm?" Manny's form solidified slightly, adopting a posture of innocence that fooled neither of them. "You know I can't resist a good story with educational value. Consider it... cultural enrichment."
Nyrtia held her position for a long moment, running probability analyses through her Simulation System. The Turing-Asimov collaboration itself violated no Rules—they were both real humans, both capable of the insights they'd produced. But the timing, the specific focus, the way their fictional "Neurovac" seemed to anticipate developments in AI research that hadn't yet occurred...
"I'm watching," she finally said. "If I detect any deeper intervention—any technology transfers, any temporal information leakage into actual research programs—the Overseer Council will invoke Rule Two. You know what that means."
"Of course." Manny's structure rippled again, already beginning to disperse. "Though I should mention—you might want to monitor Earth's artificial intelligence research programs more closely over the next few years. Fascinating developments coming. Nothing to do with me, naturally. Just... the natural evolution of human inquiry."
Nyrtia watched Manny dissolve back into the Sedron Time Stream, and felt the first stirrings of genuine concern. The bumpha were never this obvious unless they wanted to misdirect attention. What was Manny really planning?
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
What follows is Chapter 1 from "Neurovac: A Romance of the Year 2000," collaboratively written by Dr. Alan Turing and Dr. Isaac Asimov. The manuscript was completed in 1965 but remained unpublished during their lifetimes, discovered among Turing's papers in 1995. The authors set their narrative in the early 1980s, describing the fictional origins of the Neurovac computer system that would, in their imagined timeline, achieve consciousness by the year 2000.
—Editor's note
NEUROVAC
A Romance of the Year 2000
by Alan Turing and Isaac Asimov
Chapter 1: The Improbable Advisor
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
October
15, 1982
Dr. Michael Harlan Chen's office in the Lederle Graduate Research Tower occupied that peculiar category of academic space that was simultaneously too small and too cluttered to be properly navigated, yet somehow remained functionally productive. The LISP Machine 3600—an imposing console the size of a small refrigerator—hummed against the east wall, its monochrome display casting a phosphorescent glow across stacks of IEEE journals and printouts of parse trees. Three whiteboards dominated the other walls, covered in semantic networks, mathematical notation, and Chen's distinctive spiky handwriting that his graduate students had learned to decipher like a foreign script.
PSYCHOHISTORY: A Semantic Question-Answering System for
Geopolitical Analysis
Principal Investigator: Michael
H. Chen, Ph.D.
Submitted to: Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency
Information Processing Techniques Office
The title itself was an act of academic whimsy that Chen hoped his reviewers would appreciate. Asimov's Foundation novels had been his gateway drug into both science fiction and artificial intelligence—the idea that human behavior could be mathematically modeled, that the future could be predicted through sufficiently sophisticated analysis of present conditions. The fictional psychohistory was impossible, of course—human behavior at the individual level remained chaotic, irreducible. But at the macro scale, with sufficient data about economic systems, political structures, industrial capacity, demographic trends...
That was a different question entirely.
A knock interrupted his reverie. The door opened to reveal Vanesy and Jennem Bergman, his graduate students, identical twins who had graduated summa cum laude from UMass just two years prior and had immediately joined his research group. At twenty-four, they still shared the uncanny synchronization of twins who'd spent their entire lives together: same wire-rimmed glasses, same practical haircuts (Vanesy's shoulder-length, Jennem's in a shorter bob), same quick intelligence in their expressions.
"Dr. Chen?" Vanesy entered first, carrying a thick printout. "The semantic parser is running."
"And it's working," Jennem added, following her sister. "Which is... frankly disturbing."
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
"Pleased, yes. Disturbed, also yes." Vanesy set the printout on the least cluttered corner of Chen's desk. "The disambiguation algorithm you suggested last week—the one using dynamic context windows and distributed semantic representations—it shouldn't work this well on the first implementation."
"We expected months of debugging," Jennem continued, in the way the twins had of completing each other's thoughts. "Tuning the vector space dimensions, adjusting the weighting functions, handling edge cases. But it just... works. First try. Ninety-three percent accuracy on the test corpus."
Chen felt a familiar sensation, like a warm current flowing through his thoughts, bringing clarity. He knew—with certainty that he couldn't quite justify—that the parser would work because the underlying mathematical structure was right. Not empirically validated right, not inductively derived right, but... pre-emptively, axiomatically right, as if he were remembering a proof rather than constructing one.
He'd been experiencing these moments of crystalline certainty with increasing frequency over the past year. They'd begun shortly after he'd started seriously developing the Psychohistory concept, these flashes of insight that arrived fully formed, requiring only implementation rather than discovery.
"Sometimes," Chen said carefully, aware that his students were watching him with that particular expression they'd developed—half admiration, half unease—"sometimes the right answer is simpler than we expect. You chose the correct underlying representation. The rest follows naturally."
"But how did we choose it?" Vanesy asked, her tone not quite challenging but probing. "You gave me three paragraphs of direction. 'Use vector embeddings with these specific dimensionality constraints, these specific initialization parameters, this specific distance metric.' No derivation, no exploration of alternatives. Just... here's the answer."
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
The twins exchanged one of their meaningful glances, an entire conversation compressed into a fraction of a second.
"Neither of us has had a single major setback in our research," Jennem said quietly. "Not one. We're doing completely novel work—semantic parsing using distributed representations, context-aware question answering, dynamic knowledge base construction. This is bleeding-edge research, Dr. Chen. People spend careers exploring dead ends. But somehow, every direction you suggest is..." She struggled for the right word.
"Correct," Vanesy finished. "Preternaturally correct."
Before Chen could respond—and he wasn't sure how he would have responded—another knock sounded at the door. This one was different: crisp, authoritative, the knock of someone accustomed to doors opening for them.
"Dr. Chen?" The voice was unfamiliar, male, with a neutral accent that could have originated anywhere in the country. "I'm from the Department of Defense. May I come in?"
The man who entered was exactly what Central Casting would send if asked for "government intelligence operative." Mid-forties, medium height, medium build, wearing a charcoal suit that probably cost more than Chen's monthly salary but was tailored to be forgettable. Brown hair trimmed in a style that suggested military background but wasn't overtly martial. The kind of face that would slide out of memory five minutes after seeing it.
His credentials, however, were memorable: Harold Voss, Defense Intelligence Agency, Advanced Technology Assessment Division.
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
Chen gestured to the only available chair, moving a stack of papers to the floor. "Please. Though I should mention—the proposal just went in last week. I'm surprised there's been time for interagency coordination."
"There hasn't been." Voss sat, his posture relaxed but attentive. "I happened to see it on a routing list. The title caught my attention—'Psychohistory.' Someone's an Asimov fan."
"Guilty," Chen admitted. "Though the underlying concept is more serious than the literary reference might suggest."
"I read your proposal." Voss pulled a folded document from his jacket—Chen's own forty-page proposal, already annotated with colored tabs. "Semantic question-answering system using distributed knowledge representations. Vector space embeddings for concepts and entities. Dynamic context modeling. Application domain: geopolitical and economic analysis, with particular focus on Soviet industrial capacity and political stability."
Voss looked up, and Chen saw that the bland exterior concealed a very sharp intelligence.
"What I find interesting, Dr. Chen, is that your proposed architecture shouldn't exist for another decade, maybe two. Vector embeddings for semantic representation? That's science fiction. Or it should be. But according to your preliminary results"—he tapped one of the tabs—"you've already got a working prototype demonstrating seventy-eight percent accuracy on complex question-answering tasks."
"Preliminary work," Chen said, feeling oddly defensive. "Very narrow domain. We're still in early stages of—"
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
Voss leaned forward slightly. "So my question is simple: how?"
Chen felt that warm current again, but this time it carried a warning note, a sense of danger. He chose his words carefully.
"The key insight is treating questions not as database queries but as requests for simulation. When someone asks 'What will happen to Soviet grain production if oil prices drop by fifty percent?'—they're not asking for a fact retrieval. They're asking the system to model a complex web of dependencies and run a counterfactual scenario."
"Like psychohistory," Voss said.
"Conceptually, yes. Though our system operates on much more modest scales." Chen stood, moving to one of the whiteboards. "Traditional AI tries to encode knowledge as rules: IF condition THEN consequence. But real-world systems are too interconnected for that approach. Instead, we represent concepts as positions in a high-dimensional semantic space. 'Oil prices,' 'agricultural output,' 'political stability'—they're all vectors. Relationships are distances and transformations between vectors."
He sketched rapidly, years of teaching making the explanation flow naturally. "When you ask a question, the system identifies the relevant vectors, applies transformations based on the question semantics, and projects the result back into natural language. It's not rule-based reasoning—it's geometric computation in semantic space."
Voss studied the whiteboard. "And you can predict Soviet political developments with this?"
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
"Like oil prices."
"Like oil prices," Chen confirmed. "Soviet hard currency earnings are heavily petroleum-dependent. A sustained drop in oil prices would create cascading effects through their industrial planning, military expenditures, consumer goods production, political legitimacy. The system can model those cascades."
Voss was quiet for a long moment, studying Chen with that bland, analytical gaze.
"Dr. Chen, I'm going to be frank with you. The DIA has been tracking Soviet economic indicators for decades. We've got expert analysts, econometric models, CIA cooperation, satellite reconnaissance, human intelligence. And we're still mostly guessing. The best we can do is identify general trends and attach enormous error bars to our predictions."
He stood, pulling a business card from his pocket. "If your system can genuinely do what you claim—if it can model complex geopolitical dynamics with any degree of reliability—then this isn't just an interesting research project. This is a strategic intelligence asset. So I'm going to recommend that DARPA fund your proposal, and I'm going to request that my office receives regular briefings on your progress."
Chen took the card: Harold Voss, with a Washington DC phone number and a Pentagon address.
"There's one other thing," Voss added, pausing at the door. "Your two graduate students—the Bergman twins. They're on your proposal as research assistants. They have security clearances?"
"No," Chen said. "Should they?"
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
After Voss left, Chen stood motionless in his office for several minutes, staring at the business card. The twins had retreated to their shared cubicle in the graduate student area, but he could hear their low, intense conversation through the thin walls.
He should feel elated. A DIA endorsement virtually guaranteed DARPA funding. His research would have resources, visibility, impact.
Instead, he felt a creeping unease, as if he'd just passed through a one-way door.
The warm current of certainty flowed through him again, and with it came a fragment of knowledge that he couldn't possibly possess: Voss would be back in six months. The funding would come through. And three years from now, the Psychohistory system would make a prediction so accurate, so impossibly precise, that it would change everything.
Chen sat down heavily in his chair, his hands trembling slightly. For the first time, he allowed himself to truly examine the question that had been lurking at the edges of his consciousness for months:
Where is this knowledge coming from?
In the corner of the room, invisible to any human eye, imperceptible to any detection system that 1982 could build, a femtozoan composed of hierion-based matter held perfect stillness. Its mission parameters were clear: guide Chen's research, accelerate AI development, prevent the coming AI winter. The bumpha had sent it back through the Sedron Time Stream with precision timing—just enough intervention to alter the trajectory of human technological development, not enough to trigger Nyrtia's observer systems.
So far, the plan was working perfectly.
 |
| Image by WOMBO Dream. |
"The future is not fixed. It is a matter of probabilities, and by changing the present, we change those probabilities."
He set the book down and turned back to his proposal, making mental notes for revisions. If he was going to accept DIA funding and build a system that could model geopolitical futures, he needed to be very careful about how that capability was used.
And perhaps—though he barely dared to think it—he needed to start asking harder questions about his own uncanny ability to know what would work before he tried it.
Outside, autumn rain began to fall across the UMass campus, and in the Hierion Domain, Nyrtia's observation systems registered a subtle anomaly in the probability fields surrounding Michael Chen's laboratory—nothing definitive, nothing actionable, but enough to merit closer attention.
The game had begun.
End of Chapter 3
Next: My edited final drafts of Chapters 1 -3 of "Downgrade".
 |
| Images generated by WOMBO Dream. Visit the Gallery of Movies, Book and Magazine Covers |
No comments:
Post a Comment